|
weird, I just tried to post and I think it went missing....odd. Very.
Anyway, I wonder how they'd do it, cos I'm pretty sure I remember something about a case and the sentance was reduced as it was computer generated art, and not a physical person involoved.
Also any controversial art house film with sexual content would come under fire. I saw a film on channel 4 late thurs. night called war zone or the war zone, pretty sure it'd be banned.
And I really doubt they'd get the intended culprits, there's still huge paedophile rings, and gangs living off the money made from prostituting teenage girls, illegally smuggled in from Eastern Europe...
They're just trying to get moral panic, so the law will have some backing, even then they'll just be skimming the top, they'll catch some unemployed 22year old beating off to some bad porn... it'll make headlines and be all 'violence in society' how it no longer affects us as its so commonly seen. They never get who they aim for. Nevertheless I may study into it a little more, as i have to do a case study on moral panic theory. (convenient)
|