Quote:
Originally Posted by RiseAgainst
i think you missed a key part of Doug's argument
• staged (i.e. fictional) non-consensual activity (performed by consenting actors)
STAGED being a very key word
|
Do you? That's interesting because I don't think I missed that part of his argument, I just chose not to argue with it because I agree that people can stage things, and other people can jack off to it if they want, who cares?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiseAgainst
murder/amuptation/snuff isnt staged.
and all pornographic images and videos to disturbute require allparties to sign documents to claim they were of legal age, sane mind and good health before hand and i know in the USA they are required to have a doctors certificate for the last two.
|
Right. So in response to my contention, you're implying that;
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dj-Zero
• real, but consensual activity
|
is already illegal if it is violent or extreme, in the USA, which you agree with, thus undermining the original arguement against this legislation against violent and extreme porno being distributed in the UK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiseAgainst
do you believe any violence should be banned from TV as well?what about domestic violence on say Eastenders. does being hit in the head with an iron cross the extreme line?
|
No. To clarify, I believe that people should consider what this proposed legislation actually is before condemning it as nanny-state. That's assuming this legislation actually exists, this is the only place I've heard about it and the OP is source light.
The backlash site only has broken links to "The original 175 Kb pdf from the Home Office", so I can only assume they didn't just make it up.