View Single Post
Old 14th October 2006, 04:14 PM   #39 (permalink)
humndislocation
Hardcore is serious guys
 
humndislocation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,891
Band: Blasphemous Necrorapist
humndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond reputehumndislocation has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macbeth View Post
3) If possession of this material should be legal, and prosecution should be based on action then surely my possession of heroin, a gun and plutonium are all perfectly legal unless I DO something with them?
Because clearly porn containing simulated violence is to violence, as plutonium is to a nuclear bomb. There's no other reason that someone could like porn containing simulated violence... nope.

If possession of this material should be illegal, and prosecution should be based on possession, then surely my possession of a kitchen knife should lead to me being arrested. After all, the vast majority of people that have stabbed someone owned knives!

What about fertiliser? I could make a bomb with it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macbeth View Post
4) Australia and Canada (which has conducted some of the most in-depth studies of the causes of rape) both have higher rates of rape than the UK and Japan and Denmark have less it is agreed by most legal professionals that the rate of reported rape is more to do with the difficulty in prosecuting rapists than laxity of pornography laws.
Doesn't this add weight to the point that there isn't a direct correlation between the availability of this material and the incidence of rape?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macbeth View Post
5) Many sexuality experts have come to the conclusion that the internet has allowed access to diverse sexually explicit material and has led to an increase in diverse sexual activity due to perceived acknowledgement and sanction of a variety of previously taboo sexual practices.
DOES THE GOVERNMENT KNOW ABOUT THIS??? God, we might have people having sex in positions other than the missionary position, which as we all know, is an affront to God. Fucking deviants!

All taboo sexual acts are taboo because they're sick and violent and wrong! If access to porn makes people more open to previously taboo sexual acts, then clearly it follows from this that violent porn will make people violent!

It's a slippery, slippery slope. If we allow violent porn to be legal, then soon telephones will be having sex with hamsters, and all sorts of horrible things will be legal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macbeth View Post
6) Firming up this legal point strengthens that case for prosecution lawyers in sexual assault cases, which may be explained away as 'consensual.'
What if it is consensual? Won't this make it easier to someone to falsely cry rape and ruin the lives of innocent people?

Last edited by humndislocation : 14th October 2006 at 04:26 PM.
humndislocation is offline   Reply With Quote