Quote:
Originally Posted by humndislocation
That wasn't his point, he wasn't saying that you're a peadophile, he was saying that he believed the logic you were using could be used to justify child porn as well.
|
Thats a fair enough point but really when it boils down to it.... is there any excuse for being turned on by that ??
thats twisted
being turned on by fully mature women naked and bound / gagged whatever is normal human activity.
some folk have kinks ... what i was trying to say was should the government be allowed to dictate what pictures you are allowed to be turned on by given that all models were of the age of consent...
have you noticed.... i bet your still allowed to look at schoolgirl porn !!!
is that gonna make horny old men go out and try it on with 14 year olds ???
basically using the child porn argument is invalid for the simple reason KIDS ARE NOT OF LEGAL AGE TO
a) have sex
b) view sexual content
c) appear in sexual content.....
this argument is about the LEGAL ADULT INDUSTRY and how the government are trying to blinker it again....
i think that the best argument i have seen on here so far was .....
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiseAgainst
some people are happen to sit in "extreme" fantasies within their house but have no desire to do so in real life, to deny that could cause more sexual crimes
|
i think thats the point we are trying to get across here....
what next.... oh oh that song is about raping nuns.... lets ban that coz someone might violate a little sister of the poor !! :S