View Single Post
Old 15th August 2007, 09:57 PM   #170 (permalink)
LesMts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fundee
Posts: 757
LesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really niceLesMts is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by DissolveD_JameS View Post
Assuming the only way to explain nature accurately is with science, then surely that which occurs naturally that we have no scientific explanation for yet is supernatural?
Not at all. If I or one of my colleagues makes an interesting, unexplained, novel observation in our research it wouldn't be supernatural. It'd be an observed natural phenomenon, yet to be explained.
Supernatural by its definition is something outside of nature.
If I saw a "ghost" I wouldn't call it supernatural. Again, I'd have to describe it as an observed natural phenomenon, yet to be explained (actually, I'd probably consider various possibilities based on what we already know scientifically about reality - tricks of light, visual hallucinations, atmospheric phenomena - before even calling it 'unexplained').
Supernatural refers to the world of the metaphysical.

Last edited by LesMts : 15th August 2007 at 09:59 PM.
LesMts is offline   Reply With Quote