View Single Post
Old 15th August 2007, 10:06 PM   #175 (permalink)
DissolveD_JameS
Restrained Abuser
 
DissolveD_JameS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dundee
Posts: 1,264
Band: Dissolved
DissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really niceDissolveD_JameS is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesMts View Post
Not at all. If I or one of my colleagues makes an interesting, unexplained, novel observation in our research it wouldn't be supernatural. It'd be an observed natural phenomenon, yet to be explained.
Supernatural by its definition is something outside of nature.
If I saw a "ghost" I wouldn't call it supernatural. Again, I'd have to describe it as an observed natural phenomenon, yet to be explained (actually, I'd probably consider various possibilities based on what we already know scientifically about reality - tricks of light, visual hallucinations, atmospheric phenomena - before even calling it 'unexplained').
Supernatural refers to the world of the metaphysical.
Okay so the actual definition doesn't match up - but that's not the point I was making and you seem smart enough to know that. Alex said if he saw a ghost he wouldn't believe in the supernatural, i just used his words to continue the point, being - everything may one day have a scientific explanation - but that doesn't mean until then it is impossible.
DissolveD_JameS is offline   Reply With Quote