View Single Post
Old 13th November 2007, 02:28 PM   #684 (permalink)
GaryM
Registered User
 
GaryM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dundee
Posts: 355
GaryM will become famous soon enoughGaryM will become famous soon enoughGaryM will become famous soon enoughGaryM will become famous soon enoughGaryM will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by GobbHayte View Post
True, but there is no single piece of experimental evidence for the non-existence of god, only failure to prove god's existence. it's not the same thing.
There's no evidence for the non-existence of anything, there couldn't be, so that isn't an argument in favour of the existence of god, or if it is then it equally supports anything that can be imagined. If someone believes in the existence of gods simply because they can't be disproved, then aren't they compelled by the same logic to believe in fairies, flying spaghetti monsters and Russell's Teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot)?
GaryM is offline   Reply With Quote