View Single Post
Old 24th April 2008, 03:17 PM   #22 (permalink)
Thebigyin04
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MEIGLE - in the vale of farmers
Posts: 311
Thebigyin04 will become famous soon enoughThebigyin04 will become famous soon enoughThebigyin04 will become famous soon enoughThebigyin04 will become famous soon enoughThebigyin04 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keerin View Post
Because then the cost would be passed onto the consumer at a higher cost to the consumer than it would now. If a supermarket pays for something then that cost is passed onto someone else, be it the suppliers, farmers or consumers but usually all three.
i dont if it would be higher , but thats what i am suggesting , that its not the government that should place the charge on the consumer it should be the retailer , then you dont get direct political hate from the consumer.
Thebigyin04 is offline   Reply With Quote