View Single Post
Old 1st May 2008, 01:09 PM   #28 (permalink)
RiseAgainst
Senior Member
 
RiseAgainst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Work id presume
Posts: 2,555
Band: Cheat To Win
RiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the roughRiseAgainst is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesMts View Post
Why do you find it reasonable?
This isn't just banning people from watching pornography created from images or footage of actual abuse, which would be acceptable in my opinion, but also from watching or possessing violent pornography made by consenting actors using make up, special effects and/or props to depict a scene of sexualised violence.
Why on Earth should that be illegal?
you just summed the argument up perfectly there. people seem to assume all violent pornography includes genuine violence.

id rather joe random watch two actors rather than having to commit it himself to cure his lust for it.
RiseAgainst is offline   Reply With Quote