View Single Post
Old 1st May 2008, 02:46 PM   #29 (permalink)
bumperbrew
Senior Member
 
bumperbrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dundee.
Posts: 422
bumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the roughbumperbrew is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesMts View Post
Why do you find it reasonable?
This isn't just banning people from watching pornography created from images or footage of actual abuse, which would be acceptable in my opinion, but also from watching or possessing violent pornography made by consenting actors using make up, special effects and/or props to depict a scene of sexualised violence.
Why on Earth should that be illegal?
Ah, I took appear to mean that it would be banned if they were unsure if actual harm was being done but that it appeared so, as opposed to appear as in faking the violence.
bumperbrew is offline   Reply With Quote