Quote:
Originally Posted by Keerin
How many chances did United have? I count 5. Yet you have one goal to show for it? I am more than happy to grant you the offside, where it wasn't poor refereeing but interpretation of the "interfering with play" rule which denied you a goal, I think. The main point here is that you didn't create enough chances. Diving in the box doesn't count as creating a chance btw! Even outside of the dodgy officiating, the United team that played yesterday looked much poorer than the Cup Final United.
Decisions go against every team, if your team isn't good enough to pick itself up from that and continue to create goalscoring opportunities then so be it.
I think over the 90 mins, Rangers were the better side and the result reflects that superiority.
The King Billy link is ridiculous. 
Are you aware that many many people have that part of history completely wrong and that multitudinous amounts of idiotic Rangers fans idolise him for completely the wrong reasons?
never mind, read this: BBC NI - Learning - William III - King Billy - Home |
Serious hat on for a minute...
Yes, I am well aware of that. For the record, I'm a history graduate and ex-curator, so please allow me a facetious reference at the expense of moronic Rangers fans (not including yourself).
Serious hat off again...
So you reckon that all the refereeing mistakes are irrelevant because Rangers had the balance of play? What about the CIS final? We played you off the park for long periods, but yet again refereeing decisions sunk us.
To cut to the chase, Mike McCurry's refereeing yesterday (and in the past) was a complete joke and basically gifted Rangers an easy looking win when the game was anything but.
As a wee aside, United are complaining to the SPL about it, but what happened when Aberdeen made a similar complaint after a game against Rangers? Hee haw. And guess who was the referee?...