Quote:
Originally Posted by humndislocation
They usually get around that one, by claiming that evolution does happen, but that there's some magical undefined barrier that stops something from changing too much from its original state.
"Microevolution" vs "Macroevolution".
I find it amusing that even creationists have moved from saying that evolution doesn't happen at all, to saying that it does, just that it's limited. I think that says a lot.
|
I've had Creationists trot that one out at me, when I pointed out that head lice were a very good example of natural selection driving evolution. They seem incapable of understanding that macro-evolution is just cumulative micro-evolution.
They also (as is witnessed by that bullshit poster) fail to understand that evolution DOESN'T have an end 'goal' in mind, making the 'irreducible complexity' argument completely meaningless.