Is War with Iraq Inevitable - Page 2

Jarwerd · 8th January 2003, 10:49 AM

I dont want a war with iraq but i dont think we can be complacent about it. If you remember Britain let Hitler of with a lot at first and opted out of standing up to them and look what happened we could have stopped him well before. All these mad bastards in the East need to be stopped. I know it sounds facist but we should just go down there throw out their government and put troops in their all the time to instate a sort of martial law. That way we wouldnt have to fight. I know that sounds really bad as we would be impopsing ourselves in a big way but these guys are a lot worse to their own people than what we would be to them im sure. And i really dont think we should leave the E.U because without europe to back us up America would really have control of us.

ImFromMelborne · 8th January 2003, 12:28 PM

o.k Adolf.

suspended in the raw ether · 8th January 2003, 12:28 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by vysey:
"all those asian suicide bombing/commie /nazi terrorist/ terrorist harbouring moralless goddless freaks"<hr /></blockquote>dont hit me anyone that was intended to be satirical

AlanG · 8th January 2003, 05:18 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Gusto:
i just said it was all about oil, and every one knows its all about oil... i'm not sure what your point is.<hr /></blockquote>that the governments, the media and all the right wing americans are insisting its not about oil, cos only 7% of the US oil supply is from Iraq, not mentioning how much of Iraqs GDP is made up of oil sales worldwide, or to the US of course....

6months of evrything · 8th January 2003, 07:16 PM

the problem wi dode bush is that if he wasnt fighting wi iraq then it would be korea it appears that dode is starting to become what he is telling these other people not to be, bush is telling blairz to jump and that is gonna fuk the lot o us, its gonna be vietnam all over again,

what i think alot of people are losing sight of and i may be wrong is that the terror is real, this shit is gonna hit home soon enought whether it is a chemical attack on home or whether it is war,

we are dealing with 2 different battles,
1 the taliban who are attempting poorly to cause terror attacks on the uk
2 saddam and his crew who are gonna start it same as taliban

like i say i may be wrong but no1 is talkin about the attemted attacks on the uk

time to start going back to church one thinks!!!!

Ross · 9th January 2003, 01:28 AM

Yup, it's gonna happen cos Dubya's hell-bent on kicking every middle-east country (except Israel obviously) into the gorund for 9/11- he's got a bad case for revenge= i reckon we should all move to Switzerland- <a href="http://www.undergroundscene.ch" target="_blank">www.undergroundscene.ch</a> anyone? <img border="0" alt="[Fuck You]" title="" src="graemlins/fuckyou.gif" />

Jarwerd · 13th January 2003, 12:18 PM

Here i dont appreciate being called hitler. If you read what i said and had a part of your brain that understands english you would not have said that. The u.n have peace keeping troops who have been all over the world helping people by stoping their dicktators etc from pushing their people about. they're were troops in ireland helping keep the peace. Whats so facist about what i said?

Scott · 13th January 2003, 12:49 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Yup, it's gonna happen cos Dubya's hell-bent on kicking every middle-east country (except Israel obviously) into the gorund for 9/11- he's got a bad case for revenge= i reckon we should all move to Switzerland- <a href="http://www.undergroundscene.ch" target="_blank">www.undergroundscene.ch</a> anyone?
<hr /></blockquote>excpet suadi arabia, did you knwo that about 15 of the 17 hijackers were nto infact from afghanistan but from suadi and that at the time of these attakcs bin laden was probably holed up somewhere on a kidney dialysis machine. and when the air space in the US was clsoed a private plane went around the US rounding up bin ladens family members taking them back to the middle east. if only 2 of these hijackers were from afghanistan then why attack it? becos most of the worlds oil is in suadi and cause magically a couple of months after bush took over afghanistan a bill was passed to build a massive oil pipe across the country , this had been planned for a while but never went a head and when america get in its the first thing they do, and who do they place in charge of the country more ex oil tycoons.

Ross · 13th January 2003, 09:42 PM

Cos the Taliban was sheltered by the Afghan government in excahnge for Taliban funding and many members of the Taliban were in their cabinet- i think Bin Laden's a Saudi i think as well- however, you are right as they do have a lot of oil and it would be silly to hurt them <img border="0" alt="[Music336]" title="" src="graemlins/music336.gif" />

majestic007 · 14th January 2003, 02:22 PM

If the Americans decide to attack Iraq, then we will be at their side yet again. No matter if you agree or not. Bush just won't give the UN Inspectors enough time to do the job. With poodle Blair willing to risk british lives for the sake of Bush's agenda, then whats the next stage?

Its pretty clear that N. Korea poses more of a danger than Iraq at present and not to mention the growing concern of Israeli bullies. If Bush's pledge is to help the world by rooting out terrorism, then why does he pull out of a Palastine/Israel peace process to head for a full scale war with Iraq?

Hmm.....It must be a family thing. If Bush plans to root out "All forms of evil" then what will happen when the time comes we have to deal with our own threats, among others, the I.R.A

AlanG · 14th January 2003, 03:56 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Snoop Frog:
Cos the Taliban was sheltered by the Afghan government in excahnge for Taliban funding and many members of the Taliban were in their cabinet- i think Bin Laden's a Saudi i think as well- however, you are right as they do have a lot of oil and it would be silly to hurt them <img border="0" alt="[Music336]" title="" src="graemlins/music336.gif" />

<hr /></blockquote>The Taliban were the Afghan government. Who were voted in by the people of Afghanistan as an alternative to the Northern Alliance. The reason for this was the Northern Alliance had a worse record of rape and pillage than the Taliban, a case of two evils. Osama moved to Afghanistan when the Northern Alliance were in power. Now the Afghan government is made up of (us imposed) Northern Alliance members, local warlords and the "leader" is an ex oilman, one of his first jobs was to install the oilpipeline the US had announced in 97 that they would have to "use force" against Afghanistan to install if they didnt agree.

Bin Laden is Saudi, from one of the richest Saudi families. Bushs family got its wealth first from dealing with Nazis in WW2 then by striking oil deals with Osamas family afterwards. All fitted and wrapped up in a nice little package.

kj · 14th January 2003, 05:11 PM

It should also be noted that Osama's family disowned him...

Ross · 14th January 2003, 11:12 PM

And look what he's achieved now! They'd be so proud...

kj · 14th January 2003, 11:35 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by Snoop Frog:
And look what he's achieved now! They'd be so proud...<hr /></blockquote>Do you know what disowned means?

Red_Baron · 15th January 2003, 08:57 AM

Methinks good ol snoop there is using sarcasm. He's a cunt that way!!

8th January 2003, 12:28 PM	#18 (permalink)
suspended in the raw ether Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Edinburger Posts: 153	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by vysey: <strong>"all those asian suicide bombing/commie /nazi terrorist/ terrorist harbouring moralless goddless freaks"</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">dont hit me anyone that was intended to be satirical

8th January 2003, 05:18 PM	#19 (permalink)
AlanG ModSword +5 of Editing Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Dundee Posts: 3,412	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Gusto: <strong>i just said it was all about oil, and every one knows its all about oil... i'm not sure what your point is.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">that the governments, the media and all the right wing americans are insisting its not about oil, cos only 7% of the US oil supply is from Iraq, not mentioning how much of Iraqs GDP is made up of oil sales worldwide, or to the US of course.... __________________ Ernie Ross - "I'm not a rent-a-quote MP" 10 Sep 04 Ernie Ross being a rent-a-quote MP 23 Jul 04

13th January 2003, 12:49 PM	#23 (permalink)
Scott Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 1,144	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Yup, it's gonna happen cos Dubya's hell-bent on kicking every middle-east country (except Israel obviously) into the gorund for 9/11- he's got a bad case for revenge= i reckon we should all move to Switzerland- <a href="http://www.undergroundscene.ch" target="_blank">www.undergroundscene.ch</a> anyone? </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">excpet suadi arabia, did you knwo that about 15 of the 17 hijackers were nto infact from afghanistan but from suadi and that at the time of these attakcs bin laden was probably holed up somewhere on a kidney dialysis machine. and when the air space in the US was clsoed a private plane went around the US rounding up bin ladens family members taking them back to the middle east. if only 2 of these hijackers were from afghanistan then why attack it? becos most of the worlds oil is in suadi and cause magically a couple of months after bush took over afghanistan a bill was passed to build a massive oil pipe across the country , this had been planned for a while but never went a head and when america get in its the first thing they do, and who do they place in charge of the country more ex oil tycoons.

14th January 2003, 03:56 PM	#26 (permalink)
AlanG ModSword +5 of Editing Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Dundee Posts: 3,412	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Snoop Frog: <strong>Cos the Taliban was sheltered by the Afghan government in excahnge for Taliban funding and many members of the Taliban were in their cabinet- i think Bin Laden's a Saudi i think as well- however, you are right as they do have a lot of oil and it would be silly to hurt them <img border="0" alt="[Music336]" title="" src="graemlins/music336.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Taliban were the Afghan government. Who were voted in by the people of Afghanistan as an alternative to the Northern Alliance. The reason for this was the Northern Alliance had a worse record of rape and pillage than the Taliban, a case of two evils. Osama moved to Afghanistan when the Northern Alliance were in power. Now the Afghan government is made up of (us imposed) Northern Alliance members, local warlords and the "leader" is an ex oilman, one of his first jobs was to install the oilpipeline the US had announced in 97 that they would have to "use force" against Afghanistan to install if they didnt agree. Bin Laden is Saudi, from one of the richest Saudi families. Bushs family got its wealth first from dealing with Nazis in WW2 then by striking oil deals with Osamas family afterwards. All fitted and wrapped up in a nice little package. __________________ Ernie Ross - "I'm not a rent-a-quote MP" 10 Sep 04 Ernie Ross being a rent-a-quote MP 23 Jul 04

14th January 2003, 05:11 PM	#27 (permalink)
kj gimp Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Scotland Posts: 14,140 Band: A band of merry men	It should also be noted that Osama's family disowned him... __________________ This community cannot survive without your continued support. galleries \|\| links directory \|\| profiles \|\| wiki

8th January 2003, 10:49 AM	#16 (permalink)
Jarwerd Registered User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: dundee Posts: 100	I dont want a war with iraq but i dont think we can be complacent about it. If you remember Britain let Hitler of with a lot at first and opted out of standing up to them and look what happened we could have stopped him well before. All these mad bastards in the East need to be stopped. I know it sounds facist but we should just go down there throw out their government and put troops in their all the time to instate a sort of martial law. That way we wouldnt have to fight. I know that sounds really bad as we would be impopsing ourselves in a big way but these guys are a lot worse to their own people than what we would be to them im sure. And i really dont think we should leave the E.U because without europe to back us up America would really have control of us.

8th January 2003, 12:28 PM	#17 (permalink)
ImFromMelborne Registered User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: n/a Posts: 39	o.k Adolf.

8th January 2003, 07:16 PM	#20 (permalink)
6months of evrything Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Glasgow Posts: 873	the problem wi dode bush is that if he wasnt fighting wi iraq then it would be korea it appears that dode is starting to become what he is telling these other people not to be, bush is telling blairz to jump and that is gonna fuk the lot o us, its gonna be vietnam all over again, what i think alot of people are losing sight of and i may be wrong is that the terror is real, this shit is gonna hit home soon enought whether it is a chemical attack on home or whether it is war, we are dealing with 2 different battles, 1 the taliban who are attempting poorly to cause terror attacks on the uk 2 saddam and his crew who are gonna start it same as taliban like i say i may be wrong but no1 is talkin about the attemted attacks on the uk time to start going back to church one thinks!!!!

9th January 2003, 01:28 AM	#21 (permalink)
Ross Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Lenzieshire Posts: 3,613	Yup, it's gonna happen cos Dubya's hell-bent on kicking every middle-east country (except Israel obviously) into the gorund for 9/11- he's got a bad case for revenge= i reckon we should all move to Switzerland- <a href="http://www.undergroundscene.ch" target="_blank">www.undergroundscene.ch</a> anyone? <img border="0" alt="[Fuck You]" title="" src="graemlins/fuckyou.gif" />

13th January 2003, 12:18 PM	#22 (permalink)
Jarwerd Registered User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: dundee Posts: 100	Here i dont appreciate being called hitler. If you read what i said and had a part of your brain that understands english you would not have said that. The u.n have peace keeping troops who have been all over the world helping people by stoping their dicktators etc from pushing their people about. they're were troops in ireland helping keep the peace. Whats so facist about what i said?

13th January 2003, 09:42 PM	#24 (permalink)
Ross Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Lenzieshire Posts: 3,613	Cos the Taliban was sheltered by the Afghan government in excahnge for Taliban funding and many members of the Taliban were in their cabinet- i think Bin Laden's a Saudi i think as well- however, you are right as they do have a lot of oil and it would be silly to hurt them <img border="0" alt="[Music336]" title="" src="graemlins/music336.gif" />

14th January 2003, 02:22 PM	#25 (permalink)
majestic007 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1	If the Americans decide to attack Iraq, then we will be at their side yet again. No matter if you agree or not. Bush just won't give the UN Inspectors enough time to do the job. With poodle Blair willing to risk british lives for the sake of Bush's agenda, then whats the next stage? Its pretty clear that N. Korea poses more of a danger than Iraq at present and not to mention the growing concern of Israeli bullies. If Bush's pledge is to help the world by rooting out terrorism, then why does he pull out of a Palastine/Israel peace process to head for a full scale war with Iraq? Hmm.....It must be a family thing. If Bush plans to root out "All forms of evil" then what will happen when the time comes we have to deal with our own threats, among others, the I.R.A

14th January 2003, 11:12 PM	#28 (permalink)
Ross Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Lenzieshire Posts: 3,613	And look what he's achieved now! They'd be so proud...

14th January 2003, 11:35 PM	#29 (permalink)
kj gimp Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Scotland Posts: 14,140 Band: A band of merry men	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Snoop Frog: <strong>And look what he's achieved now! They'd be so proud...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you know what disowned means? __________________ This community cannot survive without your continued support. galleries \|\| links directory \|\| profiles \|\| wiki

15th January 2003, 08:57 AM	#30 (permalink)
Red_Baron Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Dundee/Alyth hybrid Posts: 1,502 Band: 15 Minutes	Methinks good ol snoop there is using sarcasm. He's a cunt that way!!