![]() |
|
Welcome to the UndergroundScene Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Uzi Lover
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dundee
Posts: 3,038 Band: Pretty much everything I touch turns to gold. Don't know what bands I play in? You should get out more you sad fuck!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I've been involved in countless discussions over The Beatles best-thing-since-sliced-bread status and I've found that the dedicated fans often push the arguement that The Beatles effectively invented the pop song and without their influence the music of today just would not be the same. That's something I completely agree with. I've read loads of interviews with folk who cite them as major influence in their music and who have in turn influenced and inspired me. However, whenever I'm encountered with the classic, 'What do you mean you don't have The Beatles in your top 5 favourite bands of all time?!?!?? They fucking influenced everyone you listen to!!!!' I feel it makes sense to answer with this: What do you reckon you would have more fun driving? A Ford Model T (developed in 1908 and one of the first mass produced cars) or a Dodge Viper(current 2008 model hits 202mph)? P.S. Heather Mills must die. Last edited by Fritz : 18th March 2008 at 09:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Foodieash
Posts: 2,278
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
McCartney & Lennon were very much the brains of the group (unless you meant Ringo). Harrison had his moments, but the most famous songwriting partnership of all time!, wrote the bulk of the songs. It would be ludicrous to suggest that Lennon wrote all the songs and McCartney just dossed about and took half the credit, wouldn't it? Eh? Even from someone who doesn't really care for The Beatles, I don't understand why there is a so much anti-McCartney feeling. He's done some utter shite (Frog Chorus, Mull of Kintyre), there was that nonsense about him changing the names round for individual song credits and he still uses the word groovy, but that's about it, isn't it? For those that are a bit more up on the Beatles than I am, why should I hate the man? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dundee
Posts: 3,132 Band: The A Forest. Kaput.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lennon has the advantage of his recording career being prematurely ended, saving his legacy from being "tainted" by another 3 decades of sub-par solo material. Leaving aside that there seems to be very little of his solo career that is widely help up as exemplary work...
McCartney's main crime seems to be refusing to retire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Solihull, West Midlands
Posts: 3,646 Band: Thee Moths, Wülfstabber, Explosions and Screaming, Catface, DJ Wrong Homer, Señor Citizen, Thee Infinite Golden Universe, Sports, WRRRMS, former member of Lipsick!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And Lennon was already getting shit by the time he was killed ('Imagine' is total garbage).
The Beatles were crap, and the argument that they invented the pop song is just bollocks, there were other bands doing the EXACT same thing around at the time, they just happened to be the 'first past the post' |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fragglerock
Posts: 968
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
quoted for truth.
amoungst the expenses heather was trying to get, there was "£30,000 p.a. for equestrian activities (she no longer rides), £39,000 p.a. for wine (she does not drink alcohol)" haha what an idiot. and im sure there was something about her wanting money to use for charitable donations too... |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2,634 Band: No, i've never been Banned.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I just reckon that people who say they don't like the Beatles haven't listened to them properly. Abbey Road is an absolute masterpiece, but most casual listeners only really know the obvious singles - like from that number 1's album. Some of their best stuff isn't even on the albums - "Rain" for example, is a pure belter. Think that was a double A side with paperback writer. There is SO much material, i find it hard to believe that there isn't something for everyone. Then again, you also get folk who say they don't like the Beatles to look cool, or appear controversial. Anyway - Heather Mills - cunt. I pure love the Beatles me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Hardcore is serious guys
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,735 Band: Blasphemous Necrorapist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the Beatles are insanely overrated, not because they weren't good, but because like many other popular bands, people put them on this stupidly high pedestal, that no band could ever live up to.
Many people seem to think that the quality of a band increases, every time they influence someone, such that no band that comes after the original band, can ever be better or more talented than the original band. For other examples of this effect, see Metallica, Nirvana. Quote:
I'm not saying The Beatles fit this description, but if you wait 40-50 years, you'll find that any mediocre, but extremely popular band will have influenced many many other bands. That doesn't make the mediocre band any less mediocre. Wait 50 years, and I guarantee you there will be scores of bands that are influenced by even the most boring, unimaginitive, overrated shit of today. The fact that a band influenced other bands, doesn't make the original band better than one that hasn't. Metallica have influenced many, many great bands, but that doesn't make them better than all of those bands. This is a concept a lot of people seem to have trouble with. Also, just because a band is influenced by another band, it doesn't follow that the second band would never have existed if not for the first. Last edited by humndislocation : 19th March 2008 at 12:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fundee
Posts: 614
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
How immensely (and embarrassingly) conceited. Last edited by LesMts : 19th March 2008 at 01:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2,634 Band: No, i've never been Banned.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
What i mean is, that i think a lot of folk are put off with the overplayed cheesy early hits (most of which are only singles, and never appeared on albums), so they don't bother listening to the actual albums - which in my opinion is where the best stuff is. Last edited by Rosco the Bosco : 19th March 2008 at 01:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|