man on the moon? or not...? - Page 2

I_got_a_mohawk · 26th September 2004, 01:20 PM

What i think's funny 'bout the moon landings is all on that program that was on Ch5 (i know, not the most reliable source! , but still) .

It was things like 2 apparent different parts of the moon having the exact same "layout" (images superimposed on each other were the exact same)

The cross hairs in some pictures being behind things.

And like alan said the cosmic radiation that would fry pretty much anything, unless it was covered in several feet of lead and concrete.

And also, how was the american flag flapping in the wind, that isnt on the moon . . . oh well

Rebelius · 26th September 2004, 01:24 PM

the crosshairs would disappear if you took a photo of something bright, any photographer should know this.

The flagpole is L shaped because they knew there would be no wind on the moon.

I don't know about the other 2 though.

I_got_a_mohawk · 26th September 2004, 01:29 PM

no, the flag is moving in a few of the videos, and the crosshairs are definatly behind some things, they arent bright, they are dull and you can tell the x hair is behind it (i cant think of how to explain this)

Rebelius · 26th September 2004, 01:32 PM

not like this then?

the flag would move due to gravity an stuff would it not? or if it wasn't completely still when the astronaut stuck it in the ground it wouldnt stop moving.

Jeebus · 26th September 2004, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I_got_a_mohawk

What i think's funny 'bout the moon landings is all on that program that was on Ch5 (i know, not the most reliable source! , but still) .

It was things like 2 apparent different parts of the moon having the exact same "layout" (images superimposed on each other were the exact same)

The cross hairs in some pictures being behind things.

And like alan said the cosmic radiation that would fry pretty much anything, unless it was covered in several feet of lead and concrete.

And also, how was the american flag flapping in the wind, that isnt on the moon . . . oh well

Did you even read the link I posted you fucking clown?

I_got_a_mohawk · 26th September 2004, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeebus

Did you even read the link I posted you fucking clown?

No i didnt you fucking clown, i was pointing out that there was a program on the TV a while back (shown again recently) about this.

~smack · 26th September 2004, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeebus

Did you even read the link I posted you fucking clown?

hilarious.

Mr Traynor · 26th September 2004, 11:13 PM

I love conspirisies in general and i was all for the moon landings being faked just cause america wanted to prove they had beet the smelly russians.
But after doing alot of research.............alot of the evidence has ben proved wrong.
Altho this could also be lies......made up to say it wasnt fake.....when it was.
Just depends how you see it i suppose.
People also say that this whole thing linked in with the jfk incident aswell. I know jfk was killed 63 and the moon "landings" were 69 but the whole space race thing was going on at the time.
Its all very interesting.

Jeebus · 27th September 2004, 02:17 AM

You are also a clown mate.

Mr Traynor · 27th September 2004, 01:55 PM

What?

Because i dont see it your way i suppose?

Altho i did agree with you saying most of the evidence was proved wrong.

oh well

Jeebus · 27th September 2004, 02:00 PM

I don't care what your point of view is. I suspect you have a substandard IQ hence the pretty colours and crazy ideas in your post.

kaleidoscope · 27th September 2004, 02:01 PM

i am writing an essay about it all now.

its quite interesting.

my conclusion is undecided though. due to lack of evidnece either way.

but i dont really mind really very much.

i just think the moon is pretty, i dont think i mind if people go there or not.

Mr Traynor · 27th September 2004, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeebus

I don't care what your point of view is. I suspect you have a substandard IQ hence the pretty colours and crazy ideas in your post.

If you dont care then stop commenting on them

Simple

no?

Jeebus · 27th September 2004, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaleidoscope

due to lack of evidnece either way.

Apart from the Moon rocks and stuff they brought back.

OMG It was probably just made by special effects guys in Holywood. Down with Amerikkka.

A couple more clowns and I'm starting a circus.

26th September 2004, 01:20 PM	#16 (permalink)
I_got_a_mohawk Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Blairgowrie Posts: 4,749 Band: Spengler	What i think's funny 'bout the moon landings is all on that program that was on Ch5 (i know, not the most reliable source! , but still) . It was things like 2 apparent different parts of the moon having the exact same "layout" (images superimposed on each other were the exact same) The cross hairs in some pictures being behind things. And like alan said the cosmic radiation that would fry pretty much anything, unless it was covered in several feet of lead and concrete. And also, how was the american flag flapping in the wind, that isnt on the moon . . . oh well

26th September 2004, 01:24 PM	#17 (permalink)
Rebelius Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 7,149	the crosshairs would disappear if you took a photo of something bright, any photographer should know this. The flagpole is L shaped because they knew there would be no wind on the moon. I don't know about the other 2 though.

26th September 2004, 01:29 PM	#18 (permalink)
I_got_a_mohawk Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Blairgowrie Posts: 4,749 Band: Spengler	no, the flag is moving in a few of the videos, and the crosshairs are definatly behind some things, they arent bright, they are dull and you can tell the x hair is behind it (i cant think of how to explain this)

26th September 2004, 01:32 PM	#19 (permalink)
Rebelius Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Edinburgh Posts: 7,149	not like this then? the flag would move due to gravity an stuff would it not? or if it wasn't completely still when the astronaut stuck it in the ground it wouldnt stop moving.

26th September 2004, 11:13 PM	#23 (permalink)
Mr Traynor Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mighty Monifieth Posts: 1,166	I love conspirisies in general and i was all for the moon landings being faked just cause america wanted to prove they had beet the smelly russians. But after doing alot of research.............alot of the evidence has ben proved wrong. Altho this could also be lies......made up to say it wasnt fake.....when it was. Just depends how you see it i suppose. People also say that this whole thing linked in with the jfk incident aswell. I know jfk was killed 63 and the moon "landings" were 69 but the whole space race thing was going on at the time. Its all very interesting.

27th September 2004, 02:17 AM	#24 (permalink)
Jeebus hates you Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Bon Jovi Posts: 903 Band: by kj	You are also a clown mate.

27th September 2004, 01:55 PM	#25 (permalink)
Mr Traynor Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mighty Monifieth Posts: 1,166	What? Because i dont see it your way i suppose? Altho i did agree with you saying most of the evidence was proved wrong. oh well

27th September 2004, 02:00 PM	#26 (permalink)
Jeebus hates you Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Bon Jovi Posts: 903 Band: by kj	I don't care what your point of view is. I suspect you have a substandard IQ hence the pretty colours and crazy ideas in your post.

27th September 2004, 02:01 PM	#27 (permalink)
kaleidoscope Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: GLASGLOW Posts: 1,346	i am writing an essay about it all now. its quite interesting. my conclusion is undecided though. due to lack of evidnece either way. but i dont really mind really very much. i just think the moon is pretty, i dont think i mind if people go there or not.