terrorists v terrorists

kj · 15th October 2004, 08:01 AM

i was wondering, since the UK and the US led coalition is having such huge problems clamping down on terrorists, would they ever seek the cooperation of other terrorists groups from the West to help against those in the middle east?

i know its a totally absurd suggestion but think about it. These terrorist groups know how they work because they are the enemy. Like another mans enemy is another mans friend so to speak.

AlanG · 15th October 2004, 08:46 AM

thats what created these terrorist groups though. Militant Islam and particularly the type used by Osama etc was fueled by America to fight against Russia in Afghanistan and against the Shah etc. Wouldnt put it past them given some of the dictators whose countries joined the "Coalition of the Willing" Uzbhekistan and Ajerbaijan Im looking at you (or however you spell em)

Gypsey_Steve · 16th October 2004, 12:25 PM

I dont think the US or UK would do this, cause the whole point ( supposdly ) of the war on iraq was to fight against terrorisism, not promote it. Maybe i'm wrong but it could make the situation even worse. Just say the terrorist group became some sort of ally, they could betray and fuck us up even more. You just cant trust the fuckers. Thats my opinion anyway.

moscow/findo · 16th October 2004, 10:39 PM

It's the sort of ambiguous thing Bush would try to pull off. He allows stem-cell research of cells taken beofre 2001, thereby being able to take credit for any positive results, but is officially against the research.
If he gets re-elected he doesn't need to give a fuck. He may aswell.
He'll give them some catchy buzzword title that will confuse middle America, and then use them to make money... or am I a bit cynical?
What a dirty cunt the man is!!!! How does he get away with it?

kaleidoscope · 17th October 2004, 05:33 PM

I Misread the title of this thread as tescos vs terrorists.

which is also a possible tactic that the goverment should think through.

they could throw tesco value bread at the terrorists. twould be muchos cheaper than weapons.

or everyone could sit round a tescos trifle and think of some nice comprimise

yes, i like this thought.

Gypsey_Steve · 17th October 2004, 06:32 PM

I also like this thought, cant beat a good tesco trifle now and again. Oh and it would be funny to see people lobing bread at terrorists.

15th October 2004, 08:01 AM	#1 (permalink)
kj gimp Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Scotland Posts: 14,227 Band: A band of merry men	terrorists v terrorists i was wondering, since the UK and the US led coalition is having such huge problems clamping down on terrorists, would they ever seek the cooperation of other terrorists groups from the West to help against those in the middle east? i know its a totally absurd suggestion but think about it. These terrorist groups know how they work because they are the enemy. Like another mans enemy is another mans friend so to speak. __________________ This community cannot survive without your continued support. galleries \|\| links directory \|\| profiles \|\| wiki

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

15th October 2004, 08:46 AM	#2 (permalink)
AlanG ModSword +5 of Editing Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Dundee Posts: 3,429	thats what created these terrorist groups though. Militant Islam and particularly the type used by Osama etc was fueled by America to fight against Russia in Afghanistan and against the Shah etc. Wouldnt put it past them given some of the dictators whose countries joined the "Coalition of the Willing" Uzbhekistan and Ajerbaijan Im looking at you (or however you spell em)

16th October 2004, 12:25 PM	#3 (permalink)
Gypsey_Steve Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: dundee Posts: 295 Band: Gypsey	I dont think the US or UK would do this, cause the whole point ( supposdly ) of the war on iraq was to fight against terrorisism, not promote it. Maybe i'm wrong but it could make the situation even worse. Just say the terrorist group became some sort of ally, they could betray and fuck us up even more. You just cant trust the fuckers. Thats my opinion anyway.

16th October 2004, 10:39 PM	#4 (permalink)
moscow/findo Registered User Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Glasgow Posts: 463	It's the sort of ambiguous thing Bush would try to pull off. He allows stem-cell research of cells taken beofre 2001, thereby being able to take credit for any positive results, but is officially against the research. If he gets re-elected he doesn't need to give a fuck. He may aswell. He'll give them some catchy buzzword title that will confuse middle America, and then use them to make money... or am I a bit cynical? What a dirty cunt the man is!!!! How does he get away with it?

17th October 2004, 05:33 PM	#5 (permalink)
kaleidoscope Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: GLASGLOW Posts: 1,346	I Misread the title of this thread as tescos vs terrorists. which is also a possible tactic that the goverment should think through. they could throw tesco value bread at the terrorists. twould be muchos cheaper than weapons. or everyone could sit round a tescos trifle and think of some nice comprimise yes, i like this thought.

17th October 2004, 06:32 PM	#6 (permalink)
Gypsey_Steve Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: dundee Posts: 295 Band: Gypsey	I also like this thought, cant beat a good tesco trifle now and again. Oh and it would be funny to see people lobing bread at terrorists.