The non-thinking that is Religion.

[Thebigyin04]

Originally Posted by Thee Alex

You fucking did

ok , so its badly worded ... but the intention was not religion came before morals , more religion was created as a way to stream how morals form ...


i think i am going to resign from this thread = you have not won= you have merely pissed me off , fulfilling the remit on your profile, so well done , you have successfully annoyed alot of people on this thread , let alone this entire message bored.

[Thee Alex]

Originally Posted by Thebigyin04

ok , so its badly worded ... but the intention was not religion came before morals , more religion was created as a way to stream how morals form ...

Religion came so far after the basic, innate, evolved 'morals', that there is no way religion was created as a 'way to stream how... [they]...form'.

More likely religion started like this -

Cavemen go out hunting, one accidentally brushes a rock on the way out the cave, grazing his arm. The hunt goes very well and he thinks the rock might have had something to do with it. So the next day he touches the rock on the way out of the cave. Seems to do the trick, another good hunt. Someone else notices him touching the rock each morning, asks why, he explains it's bringing him luck. Second man now touches the rock...... give it a few years and they're worshipping the rock, a few more and they've decided the rock needs sacrifices to ensure a good hunt....

Give it a couple of generations and you've got a religion.

Originally Posted by Thebigyin04

i think i am going to resign from this thread = you have not won= you have merely pissed me off , fulfilling the remit on your profile, so well done ,

Thanks, I aim to please, and my aim is always true.

Originally Posted by Thebigyin04

you have successfully annoyed alot of people on this thread , let alone this entire message bored.

Bye!

[Hecate]

Originally Posted by LesMts

By and large atheists don't commit atrocities in the name of atheism, which is a crucial difference.

That's fair enough, but those atrocities were committed because of personal/political/racial beliefs, and the end result was just as bad as any religious war.
I think it was the bigyin who said what difference does it make what umbrella they work under or what reasons are given, as they are all a front for the possession and control of territory or society. I agree with his sentiment.

Originally Posted by LesMts

Are we pawls again or do you still think I'm a cunt? I was honestly never trying to be a prick to you.

Oh, I didn't realise I had given you the impression I thought that of you and certainly didn't intend to. Tis cool.




Thee Alex :

My posts were intended to point out that science is constantly moving and there are large gaps of our understanding in many fields including quantum physics and medicine. Ok, so my science is not up to some people's levels on here, but I did refer to some interesting studies by recognised scientists in their field, and justified my standpoint.
You cannot scientifically argue against pantheism.

Here's an idea for you. Why not hassle Stephen Hawking the way you have everyone else, to justify his own pantheist stance, and insult him the way you have people on this board? After all, according to you, he is just as much to blame for the world's atrocities as anyone else.

In fact, I challenge you to take him on (I am sure you could find a way to contact him on the net) and post what you have said, and any resulting reply if he can be bothered with a small-minded little fucktard such as yourself.

Go on, do it. Prove your superior brain


And as for your snidey comments about Wicca....I am not Wiccan. I have already said repeatedly that I do not follow any religion, and certainly not some wishy-washy pseudo-religious American shite.
So stick that up your arse and smoke it.

Edit: Too many insults to remember! Just thought it was worth adding that yes you are right Alex I MADE Sik reply on my behalf, just like every other poster on here, I rounded everyone up at gunpoint, put nooses round their necks and FORCED them to argue against you!! Well done! Master sleuth we have here on our hands, you got me, put me in the handcuffs and throw me in UGS jail for MAKING everyone post what I wanted them to say.

[Thebigyin04]

ooft

[LesMts]

The Creation of Adam by Michelangelo



Religious masterpiece or one of the cheekiest and cleverest works of atheism in history?

[Keerin]

I like how he has the smallest penis you could dare imagine.

[Thee Alex]

Originally Posted by freakonaleash

That's fair enough, but those atrocities were committed because of personal/political/racial beliefs, and the end result was just as bad as any religious war.
I think it was the bigyin who said what difference does it make what umbrella they work under or what reasons are given, as they are all a front for the possession and control of territory or society. I agree with his sentiment.



Oh, I didn't realise I had given you the impression I thought that of you and certainly didn't intend to. Tis cool.




Thee Alex :

My posts were intended to point out that science is constantly moving and there are large gaps of our understanding in many fields including quantum physics and medicine. Ok, so my science is not up to some people's levels on here, but I did refer to some interesting studies by recognised scientists in their field, and justified my standpoint.
You cannot scientifically argue against pantheism.

Here's an idea for you. Why not hassle Stephen Hawking the way you have everyone else, to justify his own pantheist stance, and insult him the way you have people on this board? After all, according to you, he is just as much to blame for the world's atrocities as anyone else.

In fact, I challenge you to take him on (I am sure you could find a way to contact him on the net) and post what you have said, and any resulting reply if he can be bothered with a small-minded little fucktard such as yourself.

Go on, do it. Prove your superior brain


And as for your snidey comments about Wicca....I am not Wiccan. I have already said repeatedly that I do not follow any religion, and certainly not some wishy-washy pseudo-religious American shite.
So stick that up your arse and smoke it.

Edit: Too many insults to remember! Just thought it was worth adding that yes you are right Alex I MADE Sik reply on my behalf, just like every other poster on here, I rounded everyone up at gunpoint, put nooses round their necks and FORCED them to argue against you!! Well done! Master sleuth we have here on our hands, you got me, put me in the handcuffs and throw me in UGS jail for MAKING everyone post what I wanted them to say.

Your boyfriend is called 'Sik'??

[GobbHayte]

Originally Posted by Thee Alex

Your boyfriend is called 'Sik'??

and your girlfriend is called........? Oh yeah, LOL.

[Thee Alex]

Originally Posted by LesMts

Religious masterpiece or one of the cheekiest and cleverest works of atheism in history?

Wouldn't it be great if he really had been inferring that 'god' was nothing more than a product of the human brain?

[Thee Alex]

Originally Posted by GobbHayte

and your girlfriend is called........? Oh yeah, LOL.

No, it's Penny actually.

Sik????

[Hecate]

Come on Alex, take up my challenge or forever be known as a spineless, witless tard full of hot air amounting to absoloutely nothing.
Stop distracting and get on with it!!

[LesMts]

Originally Posted by Thee Alex

Wouldn't it be great if he really had been inferring that 'god' was nothing more than a product of the human brain?

Given his anatomical expertise it's hard to imagine that the detailed resemblance would be lost on him.
What he was trying to say by doing it is up for debate though?
I do like the "God is in the mind" interpretation, though. It's delicious.